tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5690677.post5282065836017117807..comments2024-03-05T01:07:44.018-05:00Comments on Tao of Poker: Absolute Morality and Full Tilt Ponzi LinksPaulyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09020689398161655082noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5690677.post-24107136061095118882011-10-15T19:01:30.322-04:002011-10-15T19:01:30.322-04:00@Dr Pauly. Ive been following you since your days ...@Dr Pauly. Ive been following you since your days on that podcast 10 years ago. I cant for the life of em rememebr the name, but it was the first time I heard that song form OAR. This was back when podcats actually had substance and worth listening to. <br /><br />Anyway, thought id share my comments with you and let you know that what your doing is good work<br /><br />Chris@ http://www.eurodonks.comtraceyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01710985100732585881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5690677.post-91045893077593925442011-09-23T16:40:53.918-04:002011-09-23T16:40:53.918-04:00Hey Tao! Have you looked into the Poker Player Aca...Hey Tao! Have you looked into the Poker Player Academy scam yet? Another hit on Pokers formerly clean slate(well reasonably). On top of that I can't believe anyone would want to buy a corrupt Company and invest millions of dollars! Its completely insane! <a href="http://shovefoldblog.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Fold Shove Poker Blog</a>SngPotheadwomanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13326114916756839240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5690677.post-71503268237245155572011-09-22T13:47:49.824-04:002011-09-22T13:47:49.824-04:00The DOJ does not, technically, have an obligation ...The DOJ does not, technically, have an obligation to minimize shareholder losses or facilitate victim restitution. Their job is to prosecute criminal conduct. However, can and did the DOJ use the media to manipulate the likelihood of a buyout deal to meet their own agenda and is that an ethical violation? Is that agenda a scuttle of the buyout possibilities, a devaluation of the assets of the company to make a buyout and some repayment of players more economically feasible for the buyer or were they just pissed off and failed to chose their words carefully?AgSweephttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802088558358326973noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5690677.post-73862779964705834042011-09-22T13:32:50.843-04:002011-09-22T13:32:50.843-04:00She is not and yes it is.She is not and yes it is.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com